阿隆索下课谁接任?六台球迷投票:穆帅得票近40%齐达内第二(阿隆索若离任谁接班?六台球迷投票:穆帅支持率近四成,齐达内第二)

Asking clarifying questions
I need to be cautious about browsing since the network sandbox could be uncertain. I can mention that in a La Sexta poll, Mourinho led with around 40%, followed by Zidane and others. However, I shouldn’t make up details or false information. To provide a better response, I'll ask for clarification: which team and timeframe? If the user wants a summary or specific report, I can propose that too while giving context.Seeking clarification for response
I want to be cautious about guessing incorrectly, so it’s better to ask for clarification in Chinese. I might say something like: "Do you want more details or a simple interpretation of the voting results?" Also, I need to confirm who "Alonso" refers to. The user might just want a brief commentary, so I should keep it concise and offer options to pick from.
If they want a summary, I could say, "According to a La Sexta fan poll, if Alonso were to leave, Mourinho is the top candidate at around 40%."
这是西媒“六台”做的球迷投票话题:如果阿隆索下课,最被看好接任的是穆里尼奥(得票接近40%),齐达内排第二。需要注意这只是球迷投票,不能代表俱乐部真实意向。
需要我:
- 找到具体投票来源与详细占比,还是 
- 简评穆里尼奥/齐达内等候选人的可行性与现实障碍?

.jpg)